Science depends on experimentation and analysis in order to gather evidence. In addition, every field of science involves the review of literature that was previously produced in order to further advance the knowledge within the field.
For the professed skeptics on this site, are you a denier or a scientist who is skeptical of parapsychology research? Have you reviewed the scientific journals and scholarly research on parapsychology, or are you relying on secondary sources and popular skeptical literature to form your opinions?
Finally, if you consider yourself a true scientist, have you ever considered submitting your crticisms to a peer reviewed journal on parapsychology? Why or why not?
I’m not a scientist,just a consumer and student of it’s results.I am skeptical of parapsychology and can’t say I have read all the journals and Research.I have read quite a bit and done quite a lot of Research on my own.Here’s what I’d need to change my mind.A psychic actually predict an event.A telekinetic move an object.An astral projector bring back a message from another room.I have to tell you,I don’t believe any of those are unreasonable requests.If you disagree,what is unreasonable about them?