Discussion Forum

Should Parapsychology be considered a separate science?

Many people like William James
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/james/
believed that psychology should include the study of the total human experience including psychic and religious experiences.
Many people that study psi are psychologist and apply those standards to their research.

Many recent scientist have conducted psi experiments according to the standards of the science they were trained in like biologist Rupert Sheldrake or medical doctor Raymond Moody.

11 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Tom EHaunting YouWinged WolfjohnlloydscharfTunsa Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Tom E
Guest
Tom E

A tough call–science is the methodical study of God’s handiwork, so if it helps to narrow things down for clarification, fine. If it helps narrow minds to shunt it aside, not so fine. Perhaps in our lifetime a breakthrough will demand fine-tuning the work of parapsychology. For now, it seems best, (to me), to leave the status quo. I hope there will be great discoveries! Life is good, there is a God, keep the faith!

Haunting You
Guest
Haunting You

If para-abilities were real then yes I think parapsychology should be considered a separate science. But parapsychologists are still struggling with showing that these abilities are real and haven’t even gotten to the business of studying the how and why. Right now it’s not even a science. But if it gets to that point then sure.

Winged Wolf
Guest
Winged Wolf

I do think it should be placed in a seperate category, because it is not a form of psychology, but instead must combine psychology and physics.

johnlloydscharf
Guest
johnlloydscharf

Strictly speaking, parapsycholgy AND psychology should be no more a science than astrology. Applying scientific method does not make a discipline a science unless all conditions in an experiement are controlled and repeatable. There are pseudoexperiments done by psychologists and sociologists, but most of the literature generated by either psychology or sociology has nothing to do with it. The same applies to “political science.”

I would say they should be separated, but it is a moot point.

Tunsa
Guest
Tunsa

All sciences borrow techniques, processes, and information from other sciences in order to advance knowledge within their field, and Parapsychology must do the same in order to be accepted in the scientific community. The essence of this question is whether the topics studied in Parapsychology are distinct enough from the other sciences to justify a separate classification. PK is a phenomenon that could be classified and studied like physics. Precognition, Clairvoyance, and Telepathy could be classified as enhanced perceptive abilities that could be studied as Psychology. The work of Mediums could, in some ways, be called Telepathy, but the claims… Read more »

Big Mama
Guest
Big Mama

I am unsure on that. There is still so much that we don’t know about that human brain that I cannot comfortably say “yes,” or “no.” Until than, I believe that maybe it is better that we take a view from both sides of the fence and not on just one.

spot a
Guest
spot a

No – because science experiments are repeatable and give consistent results when done properly

Parapsychology cannot by it’s nature be classed as science as it does not give repeatable consistent results. Noone has claimed that $1m prize yet.

One can, however, apply the scientific method to analysis of psi but this does not make it a science.

DR
Guest
DR

Yes, but only in the sense that, as in any specialized discipline, there is a vast existing literature that one needs to be deeply familiar with, both to avoid making known mistakes and to avoid wasting efforts by duplicating the wheel. So yes, a “separate discipline” is desirable because no one can be an expert in everything. Then again no, in the sense that if the experimental or analytical methods employed are too radically different from methods used in more conventional disciplines, then very few scientists from outside the discipline will spend the time to understand those new methods, and… Read more »

goosecrusader
Guest
goosecrusader

I don’t think so. Well from what (little) i know, the field of paraspychology is built on experimentation and empirical evidence like any other theorethical science.

Carl Jung had some interesting thoughts on the subject.

wrymind
Guest
wrymind

Yes. Most scientists put it down because our experience of it can’t easily be turned into the numbers that some of the other sciences have. They need to remember that their science was once on this level as well.

alexianIdol234
Guest
alexianIdol234

yes