Home Discussion Forum Neuro Psychologist Talks on The Art of Dying - Near Death Experience...

Neuro Psychologist Talks on The Art of Dying – Near Death Experience (NDE)

Is there an art to dying? And if there is, what can we do to achieve a good death? We have few special rituals to prepare for death, or to mark it, and we often fail to help the dying prepare for death.The Neuro-Psychiatrist talks on the Near Death Experience (NDE) What Near-Death Experiences Tell Us About Consciousness: Dr Peter Fenwick, renowned neuro-psychiatrist, will discuss his research on the near-death experience.Dr Peter Fenwick is an internationally renowned neuropsychiatrist and a Fellow of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Dr Peter Fenwick is Britain’s one of the leading clinical and is recognized as an authority on near death experiences and the relationship between the mind and the brain, He is president of the British branch of The International Association for Near-Death Studies.
Fenwick is a graduate of Trinity College, Cambridge, where he studied Natural Science. He obtained his clinical experience at St Thomas’ Hospital.
Fenwick’s interest in near-death experiences was piqued when he read Raymond Moody’s book Life After Life. Initially skeptical of Moody’s anecdotal evidence, Fenwick reassessed his opinion after a discussion with one of his own patients, who described a near-death experience very similar to that of Moody’s subjects. Since then, he has collected and analysed more than 300 examples of near-death experiences.
He has been criticized by the medical community for claiming that human consciousness can survive bodily death. Fenwick argues that human consciousness may be more than just a function of the brain.
“The plain fact is that none of us understands these phenomena. As for the soul and life after death, they are still open ques­tions, though I myself suspect that NDEs are part of the same continu­um as mystical experiences.”
Fenwick’s research has found that near-death experiences do not, overall, tend to have a substantial religious component. The tendency is for patients to reinterpret their belief system in light of the experience, rather than to fit the experience to their pre-existing ideas. He and his wife Elizabeth Fenwick report in their studies that near-death experiences are almost always positive in nature.
He and his wife are co-authors of The Art of Dying, a study of the spiritual needs of near-death patients. The Fenwicks argue that modern medical practices have devalued end-of-life experiences, and call for a more holistic approach to death and dying.
[quote]”The Art of Dying” contains accounts by the dying, and those who have been with the dying in their final hours, which help us to understand that death is a process. The experiences suggest that we are looked after throughout the transition from life to death, and taken on a journey into love and light by loved ones who come back to take us. Other accounts are from people who have been emotionally close to someone and who, unaware that the person they love is dying, experience a sudden strong sense of their presence or an intimation of their death. Rational, scientific explanations for these experiences are hard to find, and it is almost impossible, in the face of them, to sustain the current scientific view that our consciousness is entirely brain-based, and that it is extinguished at the moment our brain ceases to function. The world is more highly interconnected and more complex than the simple mechanical model we have followed for so long. The evidence suggests we are more than brain function, and that something – soul or spirit or consciousness – will continue in some form or another for a while at least. We can ensure a “good death” for ourselves and help those we love achieve it too. “The Art of Dying” demonstrates that we can face death with a peaceful and untroubled mind; that death is not a lonely or a fearful journey, but an intensely hopeful one.[/quote]
[quoteby by=”From The Book : The Art of Dying”] [/quoteby]


  1. “The height of egotism, is to say something can’t happen, just because we cant explain it”
    atheists….just stop.
    1: there are cases where the patients ears were plugged, and yet heard everything they said.
    2: regardless someone knows who jesus is or not, they seem to meat him, in some way, but of the same likeness
    3: they dont see santa clause, or zues, or easter bunny, so that whole argument really is childish.

    • people that have near death experiences experience many many different things. The hindu ones see a hindu afterlife and have a totall different experience than Westerners. Many people that die and come back have a variety of different experiences….. the afterlife is true but not everybody sees Jesus… for instance people with Kundalini awakenings have experienced being on another planet during his NDE and my uncle who had a NDE (dead for 4 minutes from a heart attack) had a talk with me believing God was a byproduct of the big bang…..

  2. was watching a movie at a theatre and power went out suddenly. It was a clear day and no construction going on. found out the next day my dad committed suicide.. was about the same time the power went out.

  3. “Brain function does not stop during a heart attack,”
    Death is global stroke of the brain. NDEs occur when this happens – the cortex is off.
    It ties in with the idea of a consciousness created universe, digital physics, and the natural conclusion: monistic idealism.
    The higher mind *is* consciousness, just not the “brain consciousness” – basically the “brain activity”, which is the housing for the higher consciousness.
    best wishes

  4. But there have been people who could see and hear things in great detail after their NDE. If you are in a braid dead state, you can’t see things in detail.

  5. Thanks, more and more this information will come forward, in the end it will be accepted by all, though it may take another generation to do so.

  6. Brain function does not stop during a heart attack, and the fact that people describe the resuscitation process well proves nothing – their brain is active, they can hear and possibly also see. Subjective experiences such as floating above one’s own body also prove nothing.
    Where we really begin to see proof that mind (the property that allows us to perceive) is “separate” from human consciousness is in Young’s double-slit experiment and its refinement the quantum eraser


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here