Is it true that Albert Einstein was a minuscule figure in science, but blown out of proportion?

- Advertisement -

compared to more deserving scientists?
Is it true?

- Advertisement -
Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
david g

No, his work was worthy of multiple noble prizes. Further, the true significane of a scientist is the subsequent fertility of his teories. General and special relativity have both been extrodinarily productive theories leading to many developments.


No. Albert Einstein was a giant. Among his achievements were: showing that molecules exist, showing that light comes in discrete packets called photons, showing special relativity, discovering general relativity. He was great!
In terms of influence on thinking, he ranks with Darwin and Newton.


No, Einstein’s contributions to physics were huge, and he was rightly recognized as the preeminent physicist of the early 20th century. You could argue that he got more than his share of attention from the popular press, but that was largely because he was more personable and accessible than many other scientists.


No. He deserves the place he’s got in the Physics community.


No. Where did you get this dumb idea? I guess you won’t replace him as a scientist.


Was my telepathy (thoughts being read by the world) an accident?

What were the circumstances? Or, was it not an accident?

How to control or increase the effect the 7 circles of energy which called "chakras"?

i need to know refernces of procedure and sites where i can get details. i need to know the precious stones that serve each chakra...

Have you experienced the kundalini? This is over 3000 years old, and available to all.?

The kundalini is fascinating, and I am fortunate enough to have experienced it naturally. Apparently there are drugs that may open this section...

Sleep paralysis…..real or fake?
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x