how would discribe paganism?






What is your definition of paganism, this includes wiccan, shamanism, Qabalah,santeria and other forms of religions?


  1. The literal definition of ‘pagan’ is any religeon that isnt Islam, Christianity, or Judeaism. This includes Hindus, Buddhists, Shinto, Taoists, and all the New Age Paganisms. Any religeon that is not into God is a pagan religeon.

  2. Paganism is a broad, eclectic contemporary religious movement that encompasses shamanistic, ecstatic, polytheistic, and magical religions. Most of the religions termed Pagan are characterized by nature-centered spirituality, honoring of pre-Christian deities, dynamic, personal belief systems, lack of institutionalization, a quest to develop the self, and acceptance and encouragement of diversity. Paganism is sometimes referred to as Neo-Paganism to emphasize its connections to as well as difference from pre-Christian religions.

  3. Paganism (from Latin paganus) and heathenry are blanket terms which have come to connote a broad set of spiritual or religious beliefs and practices of natural or polytheistic religions, as opposed to the Abrahamic monotheistic religions. “Pagan” is the usual translation of the Islamic term mushrik, which refers to ‘one who worships something other than God’. Ethnologists do not use the term for these beliefs, which are not necessarily compatible with each other: more useful categories are shamanism, polytheism or animism. Often, the term has pejorative connotations, comparable to heathen, infidel and kafir (كافر) in Islam.
    During the expansion of the Sokoto Caliphate in West Africa, Islamic Fulbe (Fula) labelled their non-Muslim neighbours, such as this Kapsiki diviner, Kirdi, or “pagans”.
    The term pagan is from Latin paganus, an adjective originally meaning “rural”, “rustic” or “of the country.” As a noun, paganus was used to mean “country dweller, villager.” From its earliest beginnings, Christianity spread much more quickly in major urban areas (like Antioch, Alexandria, Corinth, Rome) than in the countryside (in fact, the early church was almost entirely urban), and soon the word for “country dweller” became synonymous with someone who was “not a Christian,” giving rise to the modern meaning of “pagan.”[1] In large part, this may have had to do with the conservative nature of rural people, who were more resistant to the new ideas of Christianity than those who lived in major urban centers.
    “Peasant” is a cognate, via Old French paisent. (Harry Thurston Peck, Harper’s Dictionary of Classical Antiquity, 1897; “pagus”).
    In their distant origins, these usages derived from pagus, “province, countryside”, cognate to Greek πάγος “rocky hill”, and, even earlier, “something stuck in the ground”, as a landmark: the Proto-Indo-European root pag- means “fixed” and is also the source of the words “page”, “pale” (stake), and “pole”, as well as “pact” and “peace”.
    Later, through metaphorical use, paganus came to mean ‘rural district, village’ and ‘country dweller’ and, as the Roman Empire declined into military autocracy and anarchy, in the 4th and 5th centuries it came to mean “civilian”, in a sense parallel to the English usage “the locals”. It was only after the Late Imperial introduction of serfdom, in which agricultural workers were legally bound to the land (see Serf), that it began to have negative connotations, and imply the simple ancient religion of country people, which Virgil had mentioned respectfully in Georgics. Like its approximate synonym heathen (see below), it was adopted by Middle English-speaking Christians as a slur to refer to those too rustic to embrace Christianity. Additionally, a lot of rural parts of Europe were the most resistant to forced Christian conversions, militarily resisted Christian Europe and stubbornly held to their natural religions reamplifying the medieval use of the term.
    Neoplatonists in the Early Christian church attempted to Christianize the values of sophisticated pagans such as Plato and Virgil. This had some influence among the literate class, but did little to counter the more general prejudice expressed in “pagan”.
    While pagan is attested in English from the 14th century, there is no evidence that the term paganism was in use in English before the 17th century. The OED instances Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776): “The divisions of Christianity suspended the ruin of paganism.” The term was not a neologism, however, as paganismus was already used by Augustine.
    The urbanity of Christians is exemplified in Augustine’s work, The City of God, in which Augustine consoled distressed city-dwelling Christians over the fall of Rome. He pointed out that while the great ‘city of man’ had fallen, Christians were ultimately citizens of the ‘city of God.’
    Many Slavic peoples, especially Eastern Slavs, use the word “pagan” as an insult in their language; translating roughly as a “conniving brute.” The etymology of this meaning lies in the fact that after their forced conversion by western Christians, much of the Slavic lands took a dim view of the remaining non-Christians in their midsts.
    Heathen is from Old English hæðen “not Christian or Jewish”, (c.f. Old Norse heiðinn). Historically, the term was probably influenced by Gothic haiþi “dwelling on the heath”, appearing as haiþno in Ulfilas’ bible as “gentile woman,” (translating the Greek in Mark 7:26). This translation probably influenced by Latin paganus, “country dweller”, or it was chosen because of its similarity to the Greek ethne, “gentile”. It has even been suggested that Gothic haiþi is not related to “heath” at all, but rather a loan from Armenian hethanos, itself loaned from Greek ethnos.
    Common Word Usage
    Both “pagan” and “heathen” have historically been used as a pejorative by adherents of monotheistic religions (such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam) to indicate a disbeliever in their religion. “Paganism” is also sometimes used to mean the lack of (an accepted monotheistic) religion, and therefore sometimes means essentially the same as atheism. “Paganism” frequently refers to the religions of classical antiquity, most notably Greek mythology or Roman religion, and can be used neutrally or admiringly by those who refer to those complexes of belief. However, until the rise of Romanticism and the general acceptance of freedom of religion in Western civilization, “paganism” was almost always used disparagingly of heterodox beliefs falling outside the established political framework of the Christian Church. It has more recently (from the 19th century) been used admiringly by those who believe monotheistic religions to be confining or colourless.
    “Pagan” came to be equated with a popular, Christianized sense of “epicurean” to signify a person who is sensual, materialistic, self-indulgent, unconcerned with the future and uninterested in sophisticated religion. The word was usually used in this worldly sense by those who were drawing attention to the limitations of paganism, as when G.K. Chesterton wrote:
    “The pagan set out, with admirable sense, to enjoy himself. By the end of his civilization he had discovered that a man cannot enjoy himself and continue to enjoy anything else.”
    Main article: Heathenry
    “Heathen” (Old English hæðen) is a translation of paganus. The term is used for Germanic paganism, or Germanic Neopaganism, in particular. Originating with the Jastorf culture, the Germanic tribes were distributed over Eastern and Central Europe by the 5th century, and their dialects ceased to be mutually intelligible from around that time. Christianization of the Germanic peoples took place from the 4th (Goths) to the 6th (Anglo-Saxons, Alamanni) or 8th (Saxons) centuries on the continent, and from the 9th to 12th centuries in Iceland and Scandinavia.
    Pagan classifications
    Pagan subdivisions coined by Isaac Bonewits [1]
    Paleo-Paganism: A retronym coined to contrast with “neopaganism”, denoting a pagan culture that has not been disrupted by other cultures. The term applies to Hinduism, Shinto, pre-Migration period Germanic paganism as described by Tacitus, Celtic Polytheism as described by Julius Ceasar, and the Greek and Roman religion.
    Meso-Paganism: A group, which is, or has been, significantly influenced by monotheistic, dualistic, or nontheistic worldviews, but has been able to maintain an independence of religious practices. This includes Native Americans and Australian Aborigine Bushmen, Viking Age Norse paganism, Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, Theosophy, Spiritualism, as well as Sikhism, and the many Afro-Diasporatic faiths like Haitian Vodou, and Santería.
    Neo-Paganism: An attempt by modern people to reconnect with nature, pre-Christian religions, or other nature-based spiritual paths. This definition may include reconstructive or semi-reconstructive as Ásatrú and other groups, as well as New Age and non-reconstructive groups such as Neo-Druidism and Wicca.
    Pagan religions
    Germanic paganism
    Norse paganism
    Paganism in the Eastern Alps
    Celtic polytheism
    Ancient Greek religion
    Religion in ancient Rome
    Finnish paganism
    Ancient Near East Paganism
    Main article: Neopaganism
    In another sense, as used by modern practitioners, paganism is a polytheistic, panentheistic or pantheistic often nature-based religious practice, but again can be atheism sometimes as well. This includes reconstructed religions such as revivalist Hellenic polytheism and Ásatrú, as well as more recently founded religions such as Wicca c. 1960, and these are normally categorised as “Neopaganism”. Although many Neopagans often refer to themselves simply as “Pagan”, for purposes of clarity this article will focus on the ancient religion, while Neopaganism is discussed in its own article.
    This also includes religions such as Forn Sed, Celtic Neo-druidism, Longobardic odinism, Lithuanian Romuva, and Slavic Rodoverie that claim to revive an ancient religion rather than reconstruct it, though in general the difference is not absolutely fixed. Many of these revivals, Wicca, Asatru and Neo-druidism in particular, have their roots in 19th century Romanticism and retain noticeable elements of occultism or theosophy that were current then, setting them apart from historical rural (paganus) folk religion. The Íslenska Ásatrúarfélagið is a notable exception in that it was derived more or less directly from remnants in rural folklore.
    Still, some practitioners even of syncretized directions tend to object to the term “Neopaganism” for their religion as they consider what they are doing not to be a new thing. It must be said, also, that since the 1990s, the number of reconstructionist movements that reject romantic or occult influences has increased, even if those Neopagans who make a conscious effort to separate pre-Christian from romanticism influences are still a minority.
    Modern nature religion
    Many current pagans in industrial societies base their beliefs and practices on a connection to Nature, and a divinity within all living things, but this may not hold true for all forms of paganism, past or present. Some believe that there are many deities, while some believe that the combined subconscious spirit of all living things forms the universal deity. Paganism predates modern monotheism, although its origins are lost in prehistory. Ancient paganism, which tended in many cases to be a deification of the local deity, as Athena in Athens, saw each local emanation as an aspect of an Olympian deity during the Classical period and then after Alexander to syncretize the deity with the political process, with “state divinities” increasingly assigned to various localities, as Roma personified Rome. Many ancient regimes would claim to be the representative on earth of these gods, and would depend on more or less elaborate bureaucracies of state-supported priests and scribes to lend public support to their claims. This is something paganism shares with more ‘mainstream’ revealed religions, as can be seen in the history of the Catholic church, the Church of England and the ancient and current trends in Islam.
    In one well-established sense, paganism is the belief in any non-monotheistic religion, which would mean that the Pythagoreans of ancient Greece would not be considered pagan in that sense, since they were monotheist, but not in the Abrahamic tradition. In an extreme sense, and like the pejorative sense below, any belief, ritual or pastime not sanctioned by a religion accepted as orthodox by those doing the describing, such as Burning Man, Halloween, or even Christmas, can be described as pagan by the person or people who object to them.
    ^ The semantic development of post-classical Latin paganus in the sense “non-Christian, heathen” is unclear. The dating of this sense is controversial, but the 4th century seems most plausible. An earlier example has been suggested in Tertullian De Corona Militis xi, “Apud hunc [sc. Christum] tam miles est paganus fidelis quam paganus est miles infidelis,” but here the word paganus may be interpreted in the sense “civilian” rather than “heathen”.
    There are three main explanations of the development:
    (i) The older sense of classical Latin pāgānus is “of the country, rustic” (also as noun). It has been argued that the transferred use reflects the fact that the ancient idolatry lingered on in the rural villages and hamlets after Christianity had been generally accepted in the towns and cities of the Roman Empire; cf. Orosius Histories 1. Prol. “Ex locorum agrestium compitis et pagis pagani vocantur.”
    (ii) The more common meaning of classical Latin pāgānus is “civilian, non-militant” (adjective and noun). Christians called themselves mÄ«litÄ“s, “enrolled soldiers” of Christ, members of his militant church, and applied to non-Christians the term applied by soldiers to all who were “not enrolled in the army”.
    (iii) The sense “heathen” arose from an interpretation of paganus as denoting a person who was outside a particular group or community, hence “not of the city” or “rural”; cf. Orosius Histories 1. Prol. “ui alieni a civitate dei..pagani vocantur.” See C. Mohrmann, Vigiliae Christianae 6 (1952) 9ff.
    — Oxford English Dictionary, (online) 2nd Edition (1989

  4. Paganism is the ‘umbrella term’ for all religions which include more than one god in their worship, so yes, it includes most of the examples on your list. Pagan religions include those that grew up from tribal understanding of there being gods for everything – fire gods, water gods, hunting gods, blood gods etc. They have included some of the leading faiths in the history of the world – The ancient Egyptians were pagans, as were the Greeks and Romans, the wicca, the druids, the Vikings and so on.
    Hope this helps.

  5. At one time, we saw ourselves as fragmented beings, made out of pieces of the earth, and we were just a small corner of a great big design. And as a small thing in this great world, we had many different needs and fears and hopes, which had an infinite number of solutions. And for each unexplained mystery we stumbled on, there were many mystical explanations. This is what the Pagan spiritualities were about – belonging, feeling, experimenting, TRULY understanding, and reveling in the great mysteries. Testing new foods, new therapies, new growing patterns, entrenching ourselves in the habits of and unpredictable truths of mother nature.
    Now, we see ourselves as 1 person, locked in a meat suit until death sets us free. Most people have 1 God (representing everything beyond their power) and throw all their hopes and questions to him. There is no mystery – just us and God. If it isn’t us, it’s God. There is no alternative religion – just us and God. There is no other way of seeing things – it’s our God’s way, or no way.
    The reason for this is complex, but it can be explained best by men’s own insecurity, and a desire for both immortality and certainty. Mother nature was too fickle, and our lives too short, under the Pagan design. So though mother nature would not change, we did.

  6. If it’s an ‘ism’ it’s a religion, because ‘ism’ denotes a doctrine to define something believed to be true.
    However, Jesus-ism defies definition, thank goodness. In the same way that love – ism defies a definition. Because for many, there is no one on Earth who can define love except those who, when they try to define it in a proscriptive language of relative truth and morality, very often end up behaving in a militant way that makes a complete mockery of the meaning of the word ‘love’ as clearly shown by the mountain of hurt, maimed and killed bodies we worship in history as those who have paid a sacrifice for such ‘isms’.
    For others, Jesus is the perfect expression of love as one who showed He had the authority to define it by raising Himself up again after the world had tried to define it through violence but had FAILED. Love stooped and conquered because it is expressed eternally towards us.
    General rule then. If it’s an ‘ism’ it’s inherently violent for violence, when dialogue has run out of steam, is what people resort to as a means to impose their definition of their religion upon others.
    The Bible creates religious minds in this sense, which is why Jesus doesn’t fit comfortably into the Bible. But then, the Romans didn’t have a clue what they were doing when they stuffed Him in there.

  7. Paganism is no religious beliefs. No foundation from the Word of God. Paganism could be beliefs made up that don’t exist in the Bible. It could mean gods (Jer.10). Papal Rome adopted Pagan Rome’s beliefs; so most of the world is the same exept for one religion (Eph.5:27).

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share this


Meditation for Contacting Spirit Guides

The guide is not outside, the guide is within you. One has to go deeper into one's own being to find God and the guide. Once the inner guide is found there are no more mistakes, no repentance, no guilt.

Healing relationships with reiki

Humans by nature, are social creatures. We crave social contact so we build relationships to connect with others. Relationships do not only add spice...

Zazen Meditation

The purpose of Zazen Meditation is to free your mind of the materialistic hold our lives have on us and once you are able to allow your thoughts to enter and quietly leave without investigation you will no longer be limited. This will provide you the quiet calm needed to see the truth of your nature and your place within yourself and the world. Your body, mind, and breath will become one.

Recent articles

More like this