Forum

In your eyes does T...
 
Notifications
Clear all

In your eyes does Traditional Witchcraft go further back than Gardner and the NFC?

Page 1 / 2
   RSS

0
Community Member

I for one...beleive that practices that predate Gardner and the NFC are being done behind closed doors. After all....the Family Tradition Witches thought Gardner was what we now call "Fluffy" because he didn't have proof of his learnings. So I wonder what type of "Witchcraft" was done before Gardner started his Coven...and no I don't mean 200 years ago. I mean maybe about 50 or 100 years before him. After all even in Ceremonial Magick....Grimoires have survived for hundreds of years....why not a simple...easy to remember....vocal teaching...of the Craft?
Blessings.
Elm. That is not true. The power of suggestion is a psycological power over someone...making them manifest thier own problems...as in "American Haunting" with the Bell Witch. But some curses and healings and spells can work on a non beleiver. The Witch much simply beleive in themself stronger than the person they are working magick on.

16 Answers
0
Community Member

When man sinned that allowed witchcraft into the earth. satan is the author of all sin against God.

0
Community Member

What does the National Football Conference have to do with witchcraft?

0
Community Member

I am not a witch but I see witchcraft as going back to the middle ages and earlier...isn't it an original spiritual belief?

0
Community Member

As far back as directly after the Flood of Noah when Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammuz rebelled against God and spawned many false gods and goddesses which started many cults and false religions.

0
Community Member

I am aware of several regional traditions that predate Gardner, at least back to Victorian times. From there, it's not a huge leap back to preindustrial rural societies that could easily have harbored some traditions, although these were likely heavily Christianized to avoid detection.
The sheer amount of folklore, herbal traditions and the like suggest heavy survivals of some aspects, although probably little of the modern pagan philopsophies came from these eras. That so many tidbits survived all over the European and colonized world makes it likely that larger chunks did upon occassion also survive.

0
Community Member

Witchcraft, like all religions is a both a subjective experience and an experience that is larger than the self. It is an organic experience that grows and changes, yet it has rituals and standards.
The personality of any religions is both strengthened and changed by having it written down. It sharpens a faith to be persecuted, but it also endangers its teachings.
Life is life. It just happens as it does.

0
Community Member

It's possible, but I doubt that it was organized as such. I think it would have been more like "folk magick" than what we call Wicca. Probably the closest thing would be Kitchen Witches.
My grandmother used to read playing cards, and had her own folk-remedies.
But Witchcraft and Wicca are different things. Was there an underground "religion" that has continued for centuries? Maybe, but it's doubtful. It would have changed to the point where it would no longer be recognized. There is a Christian cult that was once part of a church in Japan, I believe. It now bears little resemblance to the church it once was, and is no longer what would be called Christian. It is more like something that evolved *into* an aboriginal religion.

0
Community Member

Witchcraft will be with us as long as people insist on believing superstitions . Witches can't put spells or curses on non-superstitious people.
They use, what is called - - - the Power of Suggestion .

0
Community Member

what is now called witchcraft was simply herbal knowledge. My grandmother was considered a 'witch' because she was a midwife and used natural methods instead of medical ones. She learned whatshe knew from her mother and grandmother.

0
Community Member

My answer entirely depends on *exactly* what you mean by Traditional Witchcraft.
If by that, you mean Gardner's Wicca -
There's a lot that has been written on this subject now and people who have done much more (way more) research than I tell me the answer is pretty much "no". And I am pretty much in agreement.
If you mean something else by "Traditional Witchcraft", then we have a bit of a different answer I believe.
However, this is a subject that if you were sitting in my living room, I could talk for hours and hours (and hours) about this.

0
Community Member

Yes, I believe that. They also say he INVENTED Wicca. I don't want to go into it since everytime I do people who follow Gardner knock me down and say I am a lier. Surfice it to say, I believe AND know through studying the history of religions both Monotheism as well as Politheism.

0
Community Member

There is no proof of any secret society of witches in England prior to Gardner. His claims of learning from Dorthy Clutterbuck cannot be verified. These are the facts. That quite a bit of the practice can be found in works of the Golden Dawn is also undisputed.
However, secret societies that have oral traditions are unlikely to be uncovered easily. We do know for a fact there were covens in France(Aradia) that predate Gardener. There are records of similar practices to what Gardener laid out. As far back as 1609 we find descriptions and accounts of those practices in the Compendium Maleficarum. Also, witchcraft existed in Italy in the form of Strega.
Considering the stigma put on (and danger associated with) such practices, to have existed at all in England, in any form, one would have had to keep complete secrecy. One cannot say that because something is not known or uncovered, we have proof of non existance. Take the Druids, we know that they existed prior to the Roman invasion, but little (if anything) is known about their practices. We also know that the influence of the Church drove the Druids underground, there were not heard from again...that they went away and disbanded really doen't wash. Someone was likely practicing somewhere and teaching an oral tradition.
All that is speculation, perhaps we'll never know.

0
Community Member

Hi there. Me again. Kinda looks like I'm your stalker, eh?
To answer your question - yes. It's far older than Gardner and Sanders. Witches were killed even back in the high times of the Roman Empire. It was ok to be pagan. It was ok to consult oracles. But it was NOT ok to work magic or be a sorcerer. To be caught doing so meant execution even 2000 years ago.
The Acts of Peter includes his wrangling with one such sorcerer. Simon the Magus. See the "early christian writings" link below.
I recently read a book by Montague Summers. In it he states that "modern" - his version of modern predated Gardner and Sanders - witch craft (back then there was no Wicca) was actually a sort of corruption of Gnosticism. The Gnostics had their own version of what we Catholics call Mass.
The Catholic Church considered the Gnostics to be heretics. Civil authorities slaughtered them.
Then along comes Protestant Reformation. Especially in England, Catholics were considered witches and executed. Burned at the stake. Hung, drawn, quartered at Tyburn Tree, with body parts strung up for all to see.
This is where the historical accounts of hidden compartments for implements of witch craft comes from. There is an old manuscript, Ancrene Wisse. You might want to give it a read. To be an anchorite (male) or anchoress (female) was the ultimate for Catholics. You lived as a solitary. The requiem mass was said for you and basically you were dead to the world. They were the wise men and wise women. During the reformation they were slaughtered. They are just now returning. Anyway, the manuscript says to say your "Blessed Be" many times throughout the day.
I don't recall how it was stated in the books I'd read by Sanders and Gardner. But I do know they never mentioned the Golden Dawn or Aliester Crowley. It was more or less the rebirth of Gnosticism and the mock mass. Stylized ceremonial magic.
Gardner and Sanders took what they'd done with Crowley and the Golden Dawn and made it their own. Two similar yet distinctly different branches of modern day witch craft.
I realize at this point that I've yammered. Probably a lot more input that you ever thought you wanted. Apologies.
Edit: For Teawitch. From their (Gardner and Sanders) points of view they did invent it. Reinvent would probably be a better term. But what they created was their own and for the most part "original."
Original as one can get when taking a corruption of the Catholic mass and turning it into the ceremonial magic of witch craft. That's why the trappings of Catholicism are still used within their workings. The chalice, the patten, altar cloths, candles and incense.
That is also why there is such a profound difference between the "witch craft" of Gardner and Sanders and "Wicca" that is so popular today.

0
Community Member

Grimoires? Are you talking about Ceremonial Magic? Well that is something I'm not savvy about at all, but I'm sure at least a few of my contacts would know... *star*

Page 1 / 2
Share: